Institutional Open Access – What Works and What Doesn’t

This panel takes a closer look on what really needs to be improved when it comes to collective Open Access funding.
Institutional Open Access – What Works and What Doesn’t
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Date

October 15, 2:00-3:00 pm, Berlin time

Access the Panel Recording

https://openresearch.community/posts/institutional-open-access-what-works-and-what-doesn-t-video-conference?room_id=frankfurt-book-fair-open-conversations

Participants

Philipp Hess (Knowledge Unlatched, Publisher Relations), Moderator
Catherine Anderson (Knowledge Unlatched, Sales)

Description

Institutionally funded Open Access (OA) for journals and books has been receiving increasing support from various players since 2012. Knowledge Unlatched, Open Library of Humanities, Luminos and TOME are a few examples of sometimes very different approaches. They all aim to secure funding for Open Access monographs in the humanities and social sciences. What all initiatives have in common is that they actively promote the development of the models through a high degree of experimentation. That there are not only successes, but also important flops, is in the nature of things. This session critically examines which approaches have been successful and which ideas have not worked, while trying to use this information to make generalising derivations. The target group are decision-makers in publishing houses and libraries who are actively involved in the (further) development of access and business models for OA journals and books.

Event Partner

Open Research Community and Knowledge Unlatched

Access

Free Event


Featured Image Credits: Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Hills, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, October 12, 2009 | © Courtesy of Chris Devers/Flickr.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Open Research Community, please sign in