Davies, Sarah W., et al. "Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science." PLoS Biology 19.6 (2021): e3001282.

This paper explores the flaws and biases of impact metrics against marginalized groups, while advocating for a change of existing scholarly value system, to advance science through principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.

Published Jun 30, 2021

Pablo Markin

Community Manager, Open Research Community

Like Be the first to like this

Pablo Markin

Community Manager, Open Research Community

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Open Research Community, please sign in

Ioannidis, John PA, et al. "Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119.28, (2022).

Bibliometrics, News, Open Access Case Studies

Gardner, Victoria, Mark Robinson, and Elisabetta O’Connell. "Implementing the Declaration on Research Assessment: a publisher case study." Insights, 35, (2022).

Bibliometrics, News

Kurata, Keiko, et al. "Monitoring the transition to open access through its mode of implementation: A principal component analysis of two surveys." PLoS One, 17.7, (2022).

Bibliometrics, News

Stahlschmidt, Stephan, and Dimity Stephen. "From indexation policies through citation networks to normalized citation impacts: Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions as varying resonance chambers." Scientometrics, 127.5, (2022).

Bibliometrics, News, Open Access Policies and their Implementation

Chiarelli, Andrea, et al. From intent to impact: Investigating the effects of open sharing commitments. Nottingham, UK: Research Consulting and Science Metrix, (2022).